For a discussion
of “Physician-assisted suicide” – Some
Definitions
(supplied by Dr. Arnold
Golodetz for VEN Annual Meeting discussion 10/14/03.) |
|
| Physician-assisted suicide
(PAS) |
|
| A
suicide facilitated by a physician’s action(s), usually by
the provision of a prescription for a potentially lethal drug, knowing
that the patient might use that drug at some future time to end his
life. The physician does not participate in the actual administration
of the drug. |
| Physician aid-in-dying (PAD) |
|
| An alternative term used
by persons who claim that in the situation of terminally ill persons “suicide” is
an inappropriate term. However, the term could be used to conflate
PAS with every other way in which physicians seek to ease the process
of dying, such as Palliative Care. |
| Euthanasia |
|
Euthanasia: Literally means “a
good death” (a
peaceful or “tame” death). The word itself does not specify
how that is to be achieved. “
Euthanasia” in common usage means ending someone’s life
with merciful intent, to relieve expressed or perceived suffering.
In a more extreme sense, it means extinguishing “life not
worthy to be lived”, on a political and ideologic basis – the “Nazi” sense.
In
the medical context, euthanasia means – a direct action
taken by a physician with the primary intent of ending life. The
paradigmatic case would be the injection of a substance that would
immediately stop heart action. Two forms are:
- Voluntary euthanasia – undertaken at the explicit, concurrent
request of a competent patient.
- Non-voluntary euthanasia – undertaken
pursuant to advance directive or surrogate decision, the patient
no longer being
competent.
[ “Involuntary” euthanasia means the ending of life
without either patient or surrogate decision, usually for social
policy purposes,
as in Nazi Germany.]
Voluntary and non-voluntary euthanasia is illegal everywhere
in the United States and almost everywhere else.
Note that, given these definitions, the proposed VT law does
NOT license euthanasia
The term “active euthanasia” covers the above meanings.
One sometimes hears the term “passive euthanasia” applied
to the discontinuance of life-support at the patient’s
request, but that is a misnomer, since it is not the direct,
intentional
ending of life.
|
| Right to Die |
|
| The popular use of the
term implies that one has a right to determine the time and manner
of one’s death,
but it is not clear where the “right” comes from. There
is no such thing explicit in any form of U.S. law. However, proponents
claim a basis in “natural law”, invoking concepts of “liberty”, “autonomy” and “privacy”.
Given this way of thinking, the question remains “Is this right
a negative right, meaning one should be left alone to end one’s
own life, or a positive right, meaning an there is an obligation
on society to provide the help needed for directly ending life?”.
And if there is such a positive right, can society limit it to the
terminally ill, or can it be invoked by anyone who is tired of life? |
| Right to Refuse Treatment |
|
| Right to Refuse Treatment: In contrast, there is a
firmly established right under the U.S. Constitution that a competent
adult can refuse any offer of medical treatment for his own reasons
(with rare exceptions), and not just in “terminal” situations.
And it is almost as clear that this right can be exercised via advance
directives. (But note that in the non-terminal situation, there would
often be reason for doubting “competence” and thus for
the exercise of “weak paternalism” on the part of family
and attendant physicians.) |
| “ Death With Dignity” |
|
| Proponents of laws permitting PAS use this label, suggesting
that dignity resides in having and using a “right to die”. |
| Palliative Care (PC) |
|
Palliative Care (PC): The literal meaning in the medical
context is “Care whose primary purpose is the relief of suffering”.
As such, PC has a place in the care of almost any medical problem,
at any stage of life, and is generally referred to as symptom-relief.
However, given a situation in which the preservation of life is no longer a goal
and relief of suffering is the predominant goal (“Palliative Care Only” or “Comfort
Care Only”), PC becomes what can be called the comprehensive care of the
dying, usually by a specially skilled multidisciplinary team, most often in hospice. |
Some
Legal Points - Vermont has no
statutory law forbidding suicide or assistance in suicide. (Some
states do). However, the Attorney-General has some discretionary
capability under common law for bringing an action against a physician
who assists in suicide. Also, the physician is at some risk of
federal action under the Controlled Substances Act. A clear act
of euthanasia would classify as homicide.

|